UK

India’s Lack Of A Batting Specialist

The BCCI just announced a provisional team for India that would take on the best teams in the hope of lifting the 2019 ICC Cricket World Cup, and I feel, they have picked a decent team. Unlike the last time when we won, the matches this time are in a round-robin format so I’m expecting some fierce contest. There were no surprises as far as the composition of the team was concerned but the batting lacks depth. I feel they’re short of a specialist batsman in the English conditions which would mean there’s too much reliance on the middle order, half-bat-half-bowler batsmen like Jadhav, Shankar and Jadeja. Sparing a thought for Vijay Shankar who has been pushed into the spotlight for no reason, but his lack of ODI experience just pales in comparison to Ambati Rayudu for the big stage matches such as the world cup. I think Rayudu’s selection would have made a huge difference when you consider the vulnerability of opening pairs to the seaming balls in the English conditions. And it’s still a possibility because this is just a provisional team.

Let us look into the details. Not only have England changed as a world-class team but if you look at how the pitches in England have behaved since the last world cup and analyze them broadly from the perspective of the home series you’ll realize the gravity of what I’m talking. It’s noteworthy, that there have been no less than 20 occasions in the English conditions where teams have posted 300+ totals, most significantly, 3 of those high-scoring ODIs have been 400+ totals. Under the context, I am baffled with the logic of going to an important tournament with a batsman short. Rayudu could have provided that extra leeway in the middle-order whilst chasing 300+ scores or when the batsmen at the top are struggling. His average of 47.05 in 55 ODIs with three 100s and a strike rate of 79.04 makes him an indispensable no.4 of the Indian cricket team. Conversely, India’s dependency on all-rounders is a worthy gamble given the fact that the England middle-order has promoted the likes of Jason Roy, Jonny Bairstow, Jos Buttler, and Moeen Ali. It remains to be seen how our all-rounders manage the world cup expectations playing on their merits. I will be tuned in!

India Batting Depth Analysis
India’s Batting Depth Analysis for the 2019 World Cup

India’s Games At The 2019 ICC World Cup

I was marking my calendar with the fixtures for India’s 2019 ICC World Cup campaign being hosted by England and Wales. The first thing that I noticed was the remarkable absence of a group/pool system which is commonly seen in events of such great sporting value (like the FIFA and the FIH world cups). Although, after their stupendous performance in recent World Cups and the team’s successive wins in recent series led from the front by Virat Kohli, the ‘men in blue’ will automatically start as my favourites to lift next year’s World Cup.

[perfectpullquote align=”right” bordertop=”false” cite=”” link=”” color=”” class=”” size=””]vs South Africa – June 5, 2019
vs Australia – June 9, 2019
vs New Zealand – June 13, 2019
vs Pakistan – June 16, 2019
vs Afghanistan – June 22, 2019
vs West Indies – June 27, 2019
vs England – June 30, 2019
vs Bangladesh – July 2, 2019
vs Sri Lanka – July 6, 2019
1st Semi-Final – July 9, 2019
2nd Semi-Final – July 11, 2019
Final – July 14, 2019[/perfectpullquote]

Strangely, this World Cup has been woefully reduced to just 10 teams, down from 14 from the previous two editions, and the other notable factor is that the groupings have been completely eliminated. Instead, all teams have been clubbed together to compete in a round-robin format of 45 matches. Firstly, a global platform such as the ‘World Cup’ deserves to have more teams competing, and a larger representation for ICC’s associate members like Nepal or Scotland would have enabled them to showcase fresh talent to their fans & audiences worldwide. Gone are the days when one could enjoy watching players from the Netherlands, UAE or Canada competing against the world’s best! And if this petition is to be believed, the 2023 edition in India would continue to feature only 10 teams. This dubious arrangement by the ICC, not only diminishes the significance of this mega event but also turns it into an exclusive affair between a handful of established teams.

Financial compulsions notwithstanding, eventually, with only a small number of teams contesting and with a complete lack of sporting standards for the event, the followers of the game are bound to feel miserable & cheated. Though, I would still look forward to a successful World Cup campaign by India next year.

The Imitation Game: Turing’s Analogy of Gaming and AI Theory

The Imitation Game produces an engrossing setting in a chamber with Detective Nock questioning Alan Turing, where he defines the theories of gaming and AI. The detective is clearly bewildered by the mathematical brilliance of his respondent. Alan Turing is widely considered as the father of theoretical computer science and artificial intelligence today.

Turing seems to ostensibly denote the inadequacy of humanity about tolerating an individual’s right to freedom (a reference to his homosexuality) while harbouring a surprising curiosity in machine behaviour to quantify its emotions.

(Very well done Benedict Cumberbatch!)


Detective Nock: Can machines think?
Turing: Oh, so you’ve read some of my published works?
Detective Nock: What makes you say that?
Turing: Well, because I’m sitting in a police station, accused of entreating a young man to touch my p**** and you just asked me if machines can think.
Detective Nock: Well, can they?
Turing: Could machines ever think as human beings do? Most people say not.
Detective Nock: You’re not most people.
Turing: Well, the problem is you’re…asking a stupid question.
Detective Nock: I am?
Turing: Of course machines… can’t think as people do.
A machine is different… from a person. Hence, they think differently.
The interesting question is, just because something, uh,
thinks differently from you, does that mean it’s not thinking?
Well, we allow for humans to have such divergences from one another.
You like strawberries, I hate ice-skating,
you… cry at sad films, I… am allergic to pollen.
What is the point of-of different tastes, different… preferences
if not to say that our brains work differently, that we think differently?
And if we can say that about one another, then why can’t we say
the same thing for brains… built of copper and wire, steel?
And that’s…
Detective Nock: this big paper you wrote? What’s it called?
Turing: ”The Imitation Game.”
Detective Nock: Right, that’s…that’s what it’s about?
Turing: Would you like to play?
Detective Nock: Play?
Turing: It’s a game. A test of sorts.
For determining whether something is a…a machine or a human being.
Detective Nock: How do I play?
Turing: Well, there’s a judge and a subject, and…the judge asks questions,
and, depending on the subject’s answers, determines who he is talking with…
what he is talking with, and, um…
All you have to do is ask me a question.
Detective Nock: What did you do during the war?
Turing: I worked in a radio factory.
Detective Nock: What did you really do during the war?
Turing: (laughs softly) Are you paying attention?